Unmistakable Tulip Tree poorly served by bees


I guess most readers will know the Tulip Tree, but part of my mission in life is to give all plants their moment in glory in my blog, whether rare or common, friend or foe, well known or largely unknown.

As is usually the case, it was a close encounter with the plant that prompted me to feature it here. In this case, in one of the beautiful private gardens of Mount Macedon, just north of Melbourne.

Liriodendron tulipifera is perhaps unmistakable. The softly lobed leaves are heart- or wedge-shaped in outline (Augustine Henry, see below, described the leaves of the related Chinese species goose-foot-shaped, which could also apply here) and the flowers, a rather photogenic cup of greenish yellow with a band of orange.


And if you think the flowers are like those of a Magnolia, you are on the right track. In the most extreme, and recent, classifications, Liriodendron and Magnolia are the only two genera in the family Magnoliaceae. More traditionally there were 11 or more genera, but all of these are now swallowed up by a mega-Magnolia. Liriodendron has always been distitive, in look and in the evolutionary trees based on comparing molecular sequences.

There are two species of Liriodendron. The first described was from eastern North America but described by Swedish biologist, Carl Linnaeus, in 1753. He named it the 'tulip-flowered lily-tree', Liliodendron tulipifera.


You can see here the ring of stamens (the male bits) around a collection of ovaries. The flower produces lots of nectar, attracting sufficient bees to create an industry in North America for Tulip Tree Honey. While the bees are good at gathering nectar they seem to be less effective as pollinators in Liriodendron tulipifera.

That's not the case in the other species. Over a century later, in 1875, the genus was collected from Lushan Mountain in Jiangxi (江西) Province, China. That first specimen was without flower or fruit and assumed to be the North American species, estabished in the forest from a garden escape.

It took a few more attempts to get material with flowers, eventually supplied by Augustine Henry, confirming that this was a distinct species, found in China and Vietnam. Liriodendron chinense has slightly different shaped leaves and no orange on the flower petals. It does, however, seem to be better served by bees (if not so well by visiting flies and beetles).

It is not surprising it took some time to recognise it as distinct. Even with flowers, there is considerable variability in leaf and flower shape and size within Liriodendron tulipifera. A dozen or so cultivars of this species available, plus a hybrid between the two species, aptly named Liriodendron x sinoamericanum.


Liridodendron tulipifera is not a species for our warming climate in Melbourne (over the last few years I've noticed a few failed plantings in my local suburb) but it is does extend over quite a wide range of climates in its natural habitat in North America. For example it can tolerate winter temperatures down to an average of -7 degrees C in New England and New York, and up to 27 degrees on average in Florida.

Which makes me think that it may continue to thrive in cooler mountain areas such as Mount Macedon if temperature rise only a few degrees over the next few decades. So for the sake of this beautiful garden plant, if not for the planet more generally, do all you can to slow the pace of climate change.


Comments

Unknown said…
In my past Role at Mayfield gardens in Oberon, NSW I was lucky enough to have experience working with many tulip trees, they are wonderful, interesting trees to have in the landscape.

They performed well there.
They grew rapidly and would self seed readily.

They did have a tendency to fail in windy wet and snowy weather. I don't know if this is typical of the species, or related to environmental or nutrition conditions.
Talking Plants said…
I've never had a garden big enough to grow this species and they don't seem suited to the Melbourne Royal Botanic Gardens. I'm not sure about their stability but it wouldn't surprise me if they had a tendency to snap - they have that look about them! Mayfield would have been a lovely experience.
Max Bourke AM said…
Thanks Tim it is one of those plants which I always think represents an ancient geological curiosity in this era of tension between the USA and China. It and other genera/families like Metasequoia/Sequoiodendron/Sequoia let alone many of the Quercus, reflect the ancient Pangaea presumably when both North America and China were one continent.
Talking Plants said…
It does 'feel' ancient but then I never know if that is just my bias towards what I was taught decades ago about magnolia-like things being 'primitive'... It's far more complicated of course, but yes that US-China link v. tension is interesting.
Stuart Read said…
Thanks Tim - I'd be surprised if they were not pretty well-suited to RBG Melbourne's climate, even if that's warming. Sydney City Council are planting (American) tulip trees on urban streets, whose radiation quota would be well-higher than the most 'paved' bits of RBGM. 27 degree maximum in Florida, noted, for all that. Sydney has had maxima of 40s in recent summers, as no doubt has Melbourne.

I think heat tolerance trials on such species would be most useful.

I note the Yankees' common name for this is 'tulip poplar' an apt descriptor, given its vigour, upright growth and bold trunk and leaves (not unlike some Populus spp.) - perhaps that same vigour (speed) means 'sappy' growth, hence the snapability? Oberon gets regular frosts and snows, so I'm hardly surprised anything vigorous loses branches to those, and storms, there.

cheers
Stuart
Talking Plants said…
Yes it does, again, 'feel' like it should grow in downtown Melbourne. I'm sure there are some about, and some that will be brought to my attention now! That connection between speedy growth and lack of structure integrity makes some sense.
Max Bourke AM said…
By the bye Tim a forest, approx 2.5 ha of them is doing very well at the National Arboretum Canberra only 10 years since planting tubestock now around 3-4m
Talking Plants said…
Ah, yes. I do remember seeing them on my last visit. A fairly tough environment for them...
Unknown said…
Wow, I wouldn't have thought of these as particularly great street trees, they drop masses of leaves quickly, whilst a carpet of yellow is pretty spectacular, once they get wet they become very slippery. the amount of branches big and small that I saw dropped in the garden at is a representative of potential risk. They are perfect for large gardens.
Talking Plants said…
Yes possibly better in parks and large gardens but I guess all deciduous trees have that leaf drop problem (and jacarandas the flower drop issue...). Cost-benefit analysis in the end! But yes, perfect for large garden as you say.
Thank you for this great article and photos. The flowers certainly look like tulips, but am I the only one who thinks that the leaves look like tulips, too?
If you are ever in New York City, I recommend a trip to the New York Botanical Garden where they have a Tulip Tree Allee that started as 26 trees planted in 1906. It is quite grand and is a designated New York City Landmark ( worth searching on the internet for photos!). Nearby they also grow L. chinense and a dwarf cultivar worth considering named L. tulipifera 'Ardis.'
Talking Plants said…
You are quite right. That isn't often commented on but true! I will definitely look out for that avenue when I next get to NY (I've only been once, and loved it). I hope you are staying safe and things improve there soon. Take care.
Rodger Elliot said…
Just a small comment Tim on your note of bees not being very good pollinators of the Tulip Tree. In fact European bees are not as good as they are cracked up to be as pollinators. In fact it is flies which are really the best pollinators but over the years their habitat has been markedly depleted and pesticide use has certainly depleted their populations. Maybe we need to think again as to how bees are being promoted as very good pollinators. Perhaps the honey industry may not take to kindly to such information.

Talking Plants said…
Thanks Rodger. Yes I gather that is true - more flies and other insects pollinate than bees generally. Agree this may not be popular with honey industry. As someone who reckons sugar is sugar I don't quite have as mystic a view of that product as others. Still, it is a fascinating creation and worth celebrating/enjoying by those who do!
Unknown said…
Thank you Tim, for all the information on the Tulip Tree that I discovered in my backyard. My backyard is large and ends at the Chesapeake Bay in Virginia. I have been searching for information bases on the leaf and the flower. My Tree is about 80-100 feet tall. Some people say you can eat the flower seed. Have you heard this said before? Thank you again
Talking Plants said…
Thanks for lovely feedback. I didn't know that about the seed but it doesn't surprise me (although always be careful eating any 'unknown' plant!). Tim